E ALLORA MARCO CHE CI DICI ?

epa08925051 (FILE) - Chairman and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg returns from a short break while testifying before the US House Financial Services Committee hearing on 'An Examination of Facebook and Its Impact on the Financial Services and Housing Sectors', on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, USA, 23 October 2019 (reissued 07 January 2021). Zuckerberg on 07 January 2021 announced on his platform that the block placed on US President Donald J. Trump's on 06 January 2021 was being extended for his 'Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete'. The move comes after various groups of President Trump's supporters broke into the US Capitol in Washington, DC and rioted as Congress met to certify the results of the 2020 US Presidential election.  EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS *** Local Caption *** 55572044

E ALLORA MARCO CHE CI DICI  ?

E ora, “caro Marco ”il riccone e simpaticone”… dicci, come ci spieghi dov’è finita tutta questa montagna di denaro speso in modo subdolo e nascosto, nel periodo di campagna elettorale presidenziale negli USA, che ha visto vincere Joe Biden su un arrabbiatissimo perdente Trump ? E’ ovvio che in democrazia ognuno ha il diritto di spendere i propri soldi come gli pare e piace e se ne ha tanti, ovviamente, li può spendere come desidera e anche in tempo di elezioni e per il candidato più simpatico ma, se poi s’infrangono le leggi elettorali del paese americano allora la questione diventa spinosa e complicata  e si corre il rischio di andare in galera. Al momento è solo un’analisi di un giornale newyorchese e un’indagine per arrivare poi a qualcosa di concreto che vuol dire trasparenza ma a volte… durante il tragitto, emergono “altarini dello sporco ed illegale”. Sarà mica che il povero Donald forse aveva ragione quando denunciava brogli e manovre strane attorno ai voti spediti via posta in diversi stati ? Certo è che la collaborazione tra il pubblico e privato con risorse private appare alquanto sospetta, cioè tanti soldi che arrivano da giri viziosi e attraverso Ong d’ogni tipo… ci lascia interdetti. Che Trump urlasse tanto durante la conta dei voti è stato qualcosa che ha colpito tutti a tal punto che certe volte noi spettatori non riuscivamo neanche a comprenderle le sue lagnanze…. Poi curiosamente tutti abbiamo pensato che il suo atteggiamento di rabbia dipendeva dalla chiara e netta sconfitta man mano che i dati arrivavano, e invece non lo faceva solo per rabbia né per aver perso la battaglia ma perché aveva intuito che manovre oscure tramavano nel buio e alle sue spalle. Certo, perdere le elezioni con un uomo che francamente non mi è mai sembrato tanto sveglio assume il tono di una beffa più che una disfatta specie quando scopri che dietro di lui c’è Marco…. Sicuramente questa notizia non passerà inosservata nel partito Repubblicano americano e credo che nei prossimi giorni assisteremo ad interrogazioni parlamentari ed altre iniziative per capire il vero ruolo del denaro di Marco. Questa è davvero una notizia esplosiva che ci dice che l’analisi effettuata dal New York Post sicuramente non verrà archiviata come una banale ed inutile notizia anzi, credo che questo sia l’inizio di qualcosa che possa far chiarezza  sul comportamento immorale dei ricconi che manipolano da decenni, secondo i loro interessi, le presidenze degli Stati Uniti d’America, antico vizio delle potenti lobby che decidono chi deve “comandare” in un determinato paese e noi in Europa ne abbiamo tracce evidenti. E con 419 milioni di dollari… vivaddio si può comprare tutto quel che si vuole anche… l’onestà delle persone e questo purtroppo è un dato di fatto comune in tutto il mondo, è anche questa io la chiamo “moda mafia”. Già… perché condizionare una consultazione elettorale con il pratico danaro e far vincere il proprio candidato è esattamente quello che fanno i mafiosi sia nei piccoli centri che nei grandi e siamo alla identica conclusione, nei fatti non cambia nulla perché è il potere occulto che decide le sorti d’una tornata elettorale e non il semplice voto. Il mondo è uguale dappertutto e gli USA non sono da meno. “Caro Marco”, prima hai messo mano al portafogli ora… metti mano al cuore e dicci la verità ! Grazie !   14102021 …by… https://manliominicucci.myblog.it/     https://vk.com/id52922915

….

 

New York Post, Zuckerberg ha speso 419 milioni e favorito Biden

‘Ha finanziato ong che hanno condizionato uffici elettorali’

epa08925051 (FILE) - Chairman and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg returns from a short break while testifying before the US House Financial Services Committee hearing on 'An Examination of Facebook and Its Impact on the Financial Services and Housing Sectors', on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, USA, 23 October 2019 (reissued 07 January 2021). Zuckerberg on 07 January 2021 announced on his platform that the block placed on US President Donald J. Trump's on 06 January 2021 was being extended for his 'Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete'. The move comes after various groups of President Trump's supporters broke into the US Capitol in Washington, DC and rioted as Congress met to certify the results of the 2020 US Presidential election.  EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS *** Local Caption *** 55572044

. © ANSA/

Redazione ANSAWASHINGTON

14 ottobre 202119:01NEWS

Durante le elezioni del 2020, il patron di Facebook Mark Zuckerberg ha speso 419 milioni di dollari a favore di organizzazioni nominalmente non partisan e non profit che hanno assistito gli uffici elettorali favorendo il voto democratico. E’ quanto sostiene una analisi del New York Post, – tabloid conservatore controllato da Rupert Murdoch – secondo cui questi soldi hanno aumentato significativamente il margine di voto di Joe Biden in alcuni Stati chiave, come la Georgia e l’Arizona, dove il candidato dem ha vinto rispettivamente di 12 mila e 10 mila voti.
“Questa fusione senza precedenti di uffici pubblico-privati con risorse e persone private è una grave minaccia alla nostra repubblica e dovrebbe essere il focus degli sforzi della riforma elettorale”, scrive il giornale. “Le elezioni 2020 non sono state rubate – prosegue il New York Post riferendosi alle accuse di Donald Trump – ma sono state probabilmente comprate da uno degli uomini più ricchi e potenti del mondo versando i suoi soldi tramite scappatoie legali”.
Nel mirino dell’indagine giornalistica in particolare il Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) e il Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), che avrebbero usato il denaro di Zuckerberg per “infiltrare” gli uffici elettorali a livello cittadino e di contea con attivisti di sinistra e promuovere campagne e prassi elettorali favorevoli ai dem, a partire dal voto per posta.

 

english

AND THEN MARCO WHAT DO YOU TELL US?

And now, “dear Marco” the rich and funny guy “… tell us, how do you explain where all this mountain of money spent in a sneaky and hidden way, during the presidential election campaign in the USA, which saw Joe win, went Biden on a very angry Trump loser? It is obvious that in a democracy everyone has the right to spend their money as they like and if they have a lot of it, obviously, they can spend it as they wish and also in election time and for the nicest candidate but, if yes ‘break the electoral laws of the American country then the issue becomes thorny and complicated and you run the risk of going to jail. At the moment it is only an analysis by a New York newspaper and an investigation to then arrive at something concrete that means transparency but sometimes … along the way, “altars of dirty and illegal” emerge. Could it be that poor Donald was perhaps right when he denounced fraud and strange maneuvers around the votes sent by post in different states? What is certain is that the collaboration between the public and private sectors with private resources appears somewhat suspect, that is, a lot of money that comes from vicious circles and through NGOs of all kinds … leaves us dumbfounded. That Trump shouted a lot during the vote counting was something that affected everyone so much that sometimes we viewers could not even understand his complaints … Then curiously we all thought that his attitude of anger depended on the clear and defeat as the data arrived, and instead he did it not only out of anger or for having lost the battle but because he had sensed that dark maneuvers were plotting in the dark and behind him. Of course, losing the elections with a man who frankly never seemed so smart takes on the tone of a mockery rather than a defeat, especially when you discover that Marco is behind him …. Surely this news will not go unnoticed in the party American Republican and I believe that in the coming days we will see parliamentary questions and other initiatives to understand the true role of Marco’s money. This is really explosive news that tells us that the analysis carried out by the New York Post will certainly not be archived as a trivial and useless news indeed, I believe that this is the beginning of something that can shed light on the immoral behavior of the rich people who manipulate. for decades, according to their interests, the presidencies of the United States of America, an ancient vice of the powerful lobbies that decide who should “command” in a particular country and we in Europe have evident traces of this. And with 419 million dollars … goodbye you can buy everything you want too … the honesty of the people and this unfortunately is a common fact all over the world, I also call this “mafia fashion “. Yes … because conditioning an electoral consultation with practical money and making your candidate win is exactly what the mafiosi do both in small towns and in large ones and we are at the same conclusion, in fact it does not change anything because it is the occult power that it decides the fate of an electoral round and not the simple vote. The world is the same everywhere and the USA is no different. “Dear Marco”, before you put your hand to your wallet now … put your hand to your heart and tell us the truth! Thanks ! 14102021 … by … https://manliominicucci.myblog.it/ https://vk.com/id52922915

….

 

New York Post, Zuckerberg spent 419 million and favored Biden

‘He has financed NGOs that have influenced electoral offices’

epa08925051 (FILE) - Chairman and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg returns from a short break while testifying before the US House Financial Services Committee hearing on 'An Examination of Facebook and Its Impact on the Financial Services and Housing Sectors', on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, USA, 23 October 2019 (reissued 07 January 2021). Zuckerberg on 07 January 2021 announced on his platform that the block placed on US President Donald J. Trump's on 06 January 2021 was being extended for his 'Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete'. The move comes after various groups of President Trump's supporters broke into the US Capitol in Washington, DC and rioted as Congress met to certify the results of the 2020 US Presidential election.  EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS *** Local Caption *** 55572044

ANSAWASHINGTON editorial staff

October 14, 202119: 01NEWS

During the 2020 elections, Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg spent $ 419 million in favor of nominally non-partisan and non-profit organizations that assisted the polling offices by favoring the democratic vote. According to an analysis by the New York Post – conservative tabloid controlled by Rupert Murdoch – that this money significantly increased Joe Biden’s voting margin in some key states, such as Georgia and Arizona, where the candidate dem won by 12,000 and 10,000 votes respectively.

“This unprecedented amalgamation of public-private offices with resources and private individuals is a major threat to our republic and should be the focus of electoral reform efforts,” the paper writes. “The 2020 elections were not stolen – continues the New York Post referring to Donald Trump’s accusations – but they were probably bought by one of the richest and most powerful men in the world by paying his money through legal loopholes”.

In particular, the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), which allegedly used Zuckerberg’s money to “infiltrate” the electoral offices at city and county level with activists from left and promoting pro-dem electoral campaigns and practices, starting with voting by mail.

 

 

francaise

ET PUIS MARCO QUE NOUS DITES-VOUS ?

Et maintenant, “cher Marco” le gars riche et drôle “… dis-nous, comment expliques-tu où toute cette montagne d’argent a dépensé de manière sournoise et cachée, pendant la campagne électorale présidentielle aux USA, qui a vu Joe gagner , est allé Biden sur un perdant Trump très en colère? Il est évident que dans une démocratie chacun a le droit de dépenser son argent à sa guise et s’il en a beaucoup, bien sûr, il peut le dépenser à sa guise et aussi en période électorale et pour le plus beau des candidats mais, si oui ‘enfreignez les lois électorales du pays américain alors la question devient épineuse et compliquée et vous courez le risque d’aller en prison. Pour le moment ce n’est qu’une analyse par un journal new-yorkais et une enquête pour ensuite arriver à quelque chose de concret qui veut dire transparence mais parfois… en cours de route, des « autels du sale et de l’illégal » émergent. Se pourrait-il que le pauvre Donald ait peut-être raison lorsqu’il a dénoncé des fraudes et d’étranges manœuvres autour des votes envoyés par la poste dans différents États ? Ce qui est certain, c’est que la collaboration entre les secteurs public et privé avec des ressources privées apparaît quelque peu suspecte, c’est-à-dire beaucoup d’argent qui vient de cercles vicieux et à travers des ONG de toutes sortes… nous laisse pantois. Que Trump ait beaucoup crié pendant le dépouillement était quelque chose qui a tellement affecté tout le monde que parfois nous, téléspectateurs, ne pouvions même pas comprendre ses plaintes… et au lieu de cela, il l’a fait non seulement par colère ou pour avoir perdu la bataille, mais parce qu’il avait senti que de sombres manœuvres se tramaient dans l’obscurité et derrière lui. Bien sûr, perdre les élections avec un homme qui n’a jamais semblé franchement aussi intelligent prend le ton d’une moquerie plutôt que d’une défaite, surtout quand on découvre que Marco est derrière lui…. Sûrement cette nouvelle ne passera pas inaperçue dans le parti American Republican et je crois que dans les prochains jours, nous verrons des questions parlementaires et d’autres initiatives pour comprendre le vrai rôle de l’argent de Marco. C’est une nouvelle vraiment explosive qui nous dit que l’analyse effectuée par le New York Post ne sera certainement pas archivée comme une nouvelle triviale et inutile en effet, je crois que c’est le début de quelque chose qui peut faire la lumière sur le comportement immoral du des gens riches qui manipulent depuis des décennies, selon leurs intérêts, les présidences des États-Unis d’Amérique, un ancien vice des puissants lobbies qui décident qui doit « commander » dans tel pays et nous en Europe en avons des traces évidentes. Et avec 419 millions de dollars… au revoir tu peux acheter tout ce que tu veux aussi… l’honnêteté des gens et c’est malheureusement un fait commun partout dans le monde, j’appelle aussi ça “la mode mafieuse”. Oui… parce que conditionner une consultation électorale avec de l’argent pratique et faire gagner son candidat c’est exactement ce que font les mafieux aussi bien dans les petites villes que dans les grandes et on est au même constat, en fait ça ne change rien car c’est le pouvoir occulte qu’il décide du sort d’un tour électoral et non du simple vote. Le monde est le même partout et les États-Unis ne sont pas différents. “Cher Marco”, d’abord tu mets ta main à ton portefeuille maintenant… mets ta main à ton coeur et dis-nous la vérité ! Merci ! 14102021 … par … https://manliominicucci.myblog.it/ https://vk.com/id52922915

….

 

New York Post, Zuckerberg a dépensé 419 millions et favorisé Biden

« Il a financé des ONG qui ont affecté les bureaux électoraux »

epa08925051 (FILE) - Chairman and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg returns from a short break while testifying before the US House Financial Services Committee hearing on 'An Examination of Facebook and Its Impact on the Financial Services and Housing Sectors', on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, USA, 23 October 2019 (reissued 07 January 2021). Zuckerberg on 07 January 2021 announced on his platform that the block placed on US President Donald J. Trump's on 06 January 2021 was being extended for his 'Facebook and Instagram accounts indefinitely and for at least the next two weeks until the peaceful transition of power is complete'. The move comes after various groups of President Trump's supporters broke into the US Capitol in Washington, DC and rioted as Congress met to certify the results of the 2020 US Presidential election.  EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS *** Local Caption *** 55572044

La rédaction d’ANSAWASHINGTON

14 octobre 202119 : 01ACTUALITÉS

Lors des élections de 2020, le patron de Facebook Mark Zuckerberg a dépensé 419 millions de dollars en faveur d’organisations nominalement non partisanes et à but non lucratif qui ont aidé les bureaux de vote en favorisant le vote démocratique. Selon une analyse du New York Post – tabloïd conservateur contrôlé par Rupert Murdoch – que cet argent a considérablement augmenté la marge de vote de Joe Biden dans certains États clés, comme la Géorgie et l’Arizona, où le candidat a remporté respectivement 12 000 et 10 000 voix.

“Cette fusion sans précédent de bureaux publics-privés avec des ressources et des particuliers est une menace majeure pour notre république et devrait être au centre des efforts de réforme électorale”, écrit le journal. “Les élections de 2020 n’ont pas été volées – poursuit le New York Post en référence aux accusations de Donald Trump – mais elles ont probablement été achetées par l’un des hommes les plus riches et les plus puissants du monde en payant son argent par des vides juridiques”.

En particulier, le Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) et le Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), qui auraient utilisé l’argent de Zuckerberg pour « infiltrer » les bureaux électoraux au niveau de la ville et du comté avec des militants de à gauche et promouvoir les campagnes et les pratiques électorales pro-dem, en commençant par le vote par correspondance.

E ALLORA MARCO CHE CI DICI ?ultima modifica: 2021-10-14T22:34:25+02:00da manlio22ldc
Reposta per primo quest’articolo